Showing posts with label scheduler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scheduler. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Error: 17883, The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung...

I've Googled myself silly on this and I'm not sure what I should do to fix
it. Will SP4 do it? These errors happen every day at 8:00 PM yet there are
no SQL Server Agent jobs running during that time. Any ideas?
2006-05-21 12:25:36.71 server Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel
X86)
.
.
2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D0E28.
2006-05-22 01:10:07.29 spid63 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex) executed
by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
2006-05-22 01:36:50.81 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 667205, first LSN:
789963:13179:1, last LSN: 789963:19503:1, number of dump devices: 1, device
information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
{'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_db_200605220130.BAK'}).
2006-05-22 12:02:03.96 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789814:10524:1, last
LSN: 789966:19764:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information: (FILE=1,
TYPE=DISK: {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_tlog_200605221200.TRN'}).
2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
59, ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D27E8.
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C5A68.
2006-05-23 01:10:06.00 spid52 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex) executed
by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
2006-05-23 01:37:12.34 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 668013, first LSN:
790081:6357:1, last LSN: 790081:12597:1, number of dump devices: 1, device
information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
{'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_db_200605230130.BAK'}).
2006-05-23 12:01:04.71 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789966:19764:1, last
LSN: 790091:2027:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information: (FILE=1,
TYPE=DISK: {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_tlog_200605231200.TRN'}).
2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D7AA8.
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 2 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D6F60.
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039DCD98.Scagnetti,
Try refresh on the jobs collection also take a look at your Database
Maintenance Plans. Is this a target server for a master server?
HTH
Jerry
"Scagnetti" <Scagnetti@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6635ACAF-0BD1-48BE-BFD4-4D459F34786E@.microsoft.com...
> I've Googled myself silly on this and I'm not sure what I should do to fix
> it. Will SP4 do it? These errors happen every day at 8:00 PM yet there
> are
> no SQL Server Agent jobs running during that time. Any ideas?
> 2006-05-21 12:25:36.71 server Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel
> X86)
> .
> .
> 2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D0E28.
> 2006-05-22 01:10:07.29 spid63 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex)
> executed
> by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
> 2006-05-22 01:36:50.81 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 667205, first
> LSN:
> 789963:13179:1, last LSN: 789963:19503:1, number of dump devices: 1,
> device
> information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
> {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_db_200605220130.BAK'}).
> 2006-05-22 12:02:03.96 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789814:10524:1, last
> LSN: 789966:19764:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information:
> (FILE=1,
> TYPE=DISK: {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_tlog_200605221200.TRN'}).
> 2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
> 59, ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D27E8.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C5A68.
> 2006-05-23 01:10:06.00 spid52 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex)
> executed
> by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
> 2006-05-23 01:37:12.34 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 668013, first
> LSN:
> 790081:6357:1, last LSN: 790081:12597:1, number of dump devices: 1, device
> information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
> {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_db_200605230130.BAK'}).
> 2006-05-23 12:01:04.71 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789966:19764:1, last
> LSN: 790091:2027:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information:
> (FILE=1,
> TYPE=DISK: {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_tlog_200605231200.TRN'}).
> 2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D7AA8.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 2 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D6F60.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039DCD98.
>|||The scheduler referenced in the error message isn't SQL Agent - it's the
internal task scheduler UMS - User Mode Scheduler. This basically means
that a thread became stuck. Here are a few possible causes:
http://support.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx?catalog=LCID%3D1033&spid=global&query=17883&adv=&mode=r&cat=False
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
"Scagnetti" <Scagnetti@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6635ACAF-0BD1-48BE-BFD4-4D459F34786E@.microsoft.com...
> I've Googled myself silly on this and I'm not sure what I should do to fix
> it. Will SP4 do it? These errors happen every day at 8:00 PM yet there
> are
> no SQL Server Agent jobs running during that time. Any ideas?
> 2006-05-21 12:25:36.71 server Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel
> X86)
> .
> .
> 2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D0E28.
> 2006-05-22 01:10:07.29 spid63 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex)
> executed
> by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
> 2006-05-22 01:36:50.81 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 667205, first
> LSN:
> 789963:13179:1, last LSN: 789963:19503:1, number of dump devices: 1,
> device
> information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
> {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_db_200605220130.BAK'}).
> 2006-05-22 12:02:03.96 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789814:10524:1, last
> LSN: 789966:19764:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information:
> (FILE=1,
> TYPE=DISK: {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_tlog_200605221200.TRN'}).
> 2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
> 59, ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D27E8.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C5A68.
> 2006-05-23 01:10:06.00 spid52 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex)
> executed
> by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
> 2006-05-23 01:37:12.34 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 668013, first
> LSN:
> 790081:6357:1, last LSN: 790081:12597:1, number of dump devices: 1, device
> information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
> {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_db_200605230130.BAK'}).
> 2006-05-23 12:01:04.71 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789966:19764:1, last
> LSN: 790091:2027:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information:
> (FILE=1,
> TYPE=DISK: {'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_tlog_200605231200.TRN'}).
> 2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D7AA8.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 2 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D6F60.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039DCD98.
>

Error: 17883, The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung...

I've Googled myself silly on this and I'm not sure what I should do to fix
it. Will SP4 do it? These errors happen every day at 8:00 PM yet there are
no SQL Server Agent jobs running during that time. Any ideas?
2006-05-21 12:25:36.71 server Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel
X86)
.
.
2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D0E28.
2006-05-22 01:10:07.29 spid63 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex) executed
by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
2006-05-22 01:36:50.81 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 667205, first LSN:
789963:13179:1, last LSN: 789963:19503:1, number of dump devices: 1, device
information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
& #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_d
b_200605220130.BAK'}).
2006-05-22 12:02:03.96 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789814:10524:1, last
LSN: 789966:19764:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information: (FILE=1,
TYPE=DISK: & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_t
log_200605221200.TRN'}).
2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
59, ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D27E8.
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C5A68.
2006-05-23 01:10:06.00 spid52 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex) executed
by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
2006-05-23 01:37:12.34 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 668013, first LSN:
790081:6357:1, last LSN: 790081:12597:1, number of dump devices: 1, device
information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
& #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_d
b_200605230130.BAK'}).
2006-05-23 12:01:04.71 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789966:19764:1, last
LSN: 790091:2027:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information: (FILE=1,
TYPE=DISK: & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_t
log_200605231200.TRN'}).
2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D7AA8.
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 2 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D6F60.
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID 0,
ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039DCD98.Scagnetti,
Try refresh on the jobs collection also take a look at your Database
Maintenance Plans. Is this a target server for a master server?
HTH
Jerry
"Scagnetti" <Scagnetti@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6635ACAF-0BD1-48BE-BFD4-4D459F34786E@.microsoft.com...
> I've Googled myself silly on this and I'm not sure what I should do to fix
> it. Will SP4 do it? These errors happen every day at 8:00 PM yet there
> are
> no SQL Server Agent jobs running during that time. Any ideas?
> 2006-05-21 12:25:36.71 server Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel
> X86)
> .
> .
> 2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D0E28.
> 2006-05-22 01:10:07.29 spid63 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex)
> executed
> by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
> 2006-05-22 01:36:50.81 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 667205, first
> LSN:
> 789963:13179:1, last LSN: 789963:19503:1, number of dump devices: 1,
> device
> information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
> & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_d
b_200605220130.BAK'}).
> 2006-05-22 12:02:03.96 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789814:10524:1, last
> LSN: 789966:19764:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information:
> (FILE=1,
> TYPE=DISK: & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_t
log_200605221200.TRN'}
).
> 2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
> 59, ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D27E8.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C5A68.
> 2006-05-23 01:10:06.00 spid52 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex)
> executed
> by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
> 2006-05-23 01:37:12.34 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 668013, first
> LSN:
> 790081:6357:1, last LSN: 790081:12597:1, number of dump devices: 1, device
> information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
> & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_d
b_200605230130.BAK'}).
> 2006-05-23 12:01:04.71 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789966:19764:1, last
> LSN: 790091:2027:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information:
> (FILE=1,
> TYPE=DISK: & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_t
log_200605231200.TRN'}
).
> 2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D7AA8.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 2 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D6F60.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039DCD98.
>|||The scheduler referenced in the error message isn't SQL Agent - it's the
internal task scheduler UMS - User Mode Scheduler. This basically means
that a thread became stuck. Here are a few possible causes:
http://support.microsoft.com/search...ode=r&cat=False
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
"Scagnetti" <Scagnetti@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6635ACAF-0BD1-48BE-BFD4-4D459F34786E@.microsoft.com...
> I've Googled myself silly on this and I'm not sure what I should do to fix
> it. Will SP4 do it? These errors happen every day at 8:00 PM yet there
> are
> no SQL Server Agent jobs running during that time. Any ideas?
> 2006-05-21 12:25:36.71 server Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel
> X86)
> .
> .
> 2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-21 20:20:09.00 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D0E28.
> 2006-05-22 01:10:07.29 spid63 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex)
> executed
> by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
> 2006-05-22 01:36:50.81 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 667205, first
> LSN:
> 789963:13179:1, last LSN: 789963:19503:1, number of dump devices: 1,
> device
> information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
> & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_d
b_200605220130.BAK'}).
> 2006-05-22 12:02:03.96 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789814:10524:1, last
> LSN: 789966:19764:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information:
> (FILE=1,
> TYPE=DISK: & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_t
log_200605221200.TRN'}
).
> 2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:11:08.85 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C3D10.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
> 59, ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D27E8.
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-22 20:12:08.86 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039C5A68.
> 2006-05-23 01:10:06.00 spid52 DBCC CHECKDB (iGreentree, noindex)
> executed
> by CORP\svc-hr-sql found 0 errors and repaired 0 errors.
> 2006-05-23 01:37:12.34 backup Database backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), pages dumped: 668013, first
> LSN:
> 790081:6357:1, last LSN: 790081:12597:1, number of dump devices: 1, device
> information: (FILE=1, TYPE=DISK:
> & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_d
b_200605230130.BAK'}).
> 2006-05-23 12:01:04.71 backup Log backed up: Database: iGreentree,
> creation date(time): 2003/07/28(16:29:20), first LSN: 789966:19764:1, last
> LSN: 790091:2027:1, number of dump devices: 1, device information:
> (FILE=1,
> TYPE=DISK: & #123;'F:\SQL_BAK\iGreentree\iGreentree_t
log_200605231200.TRN'}
).
> 2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:22:08.77 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 0 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D3548.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 1 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D7AA8.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 2 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039D6F60.
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
> 2006-05-23 20:23:08.82 server The Scheduler 3 appears to be hung. SPID
> 0,
> ECID 0, UMS Context 0x039DCD98.
>

Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0

Hi ,
We are getting 17833 error with below message .
Process 54:0 (ac4) UMS Context 0x09F5C830 appears to be non-yielding on
Scheduler 3.
We have SQL 2000 SP4 , per MS documentation this bug has been fixed in SP4
but I still see this in SQL log at least once a week .
Can you pl. suggest the solution .
Thanks,
PrabhuTry to open a case with MS, when we did, they asked us to forward the
minidump file that gets created when that error is recorded in the SQL server
logs. Once MS took a look at the dump file, they determined that the errors
indicate possible underlying hardware issues on writes and reads, that effect
performance and hangs the scheduler. They recommended a thorough test of the
EMC hardware portion. So open a case and send them the minidump files you
should have on your harddrive and they can try to detect what may ba causing
SQL Server to throw error 17883. My understanding is that error 17883 can be
caused by many reasons, could be SQL server related and could be other
resource related.
"Prabhu" wrote:
> Hi ,
> We are getting 17833 error with below message .
> Process 54:0 (ac4) UMS Context 0x09F5C830 appears to be non-yielding on
> Scheduler 3.
> We have SQL 2000 SP4 , per MS documentation this bug has been fixed in SP4
> but I still see this in SQL log at least once a week .
> Can you pl. suggest the solution .
> Thanks,
> Prabhu

Error: 17883 - The scheduler 0 appears to be hung...

Environment:
Clustered SQL Server 2K sp3a (single instance)
Product version: 8.00.760
Problem:
I end up in error 17883.
I am aware that the solution is to apply this patch:
821277 MS03-031:Security Patch for SQL Server 2000 Service
Pack 3.
I am also aware that after you install this cumulative
patch you will end up in this problem:
826161 FIX: You are prompted for password after you change
a standard SQL Server login.
After reading this one I found that there are 2
possibility to solve this problem, one if you have already
installed the security patch from MS03-031 and another one
if you do NOT have installed this patch.
Question:
Do I only need to apply this last one (is it also
cumulative?) or do I need to first apply MS03-031 and then
later the FIX 826161?
Please advise.
Kind regards.
You will need to follow the instructions in the section "If you have not
installed the security patch for Microsoft Security Bulletin
MS03-031,Q826161..." . This will include the
fix for the Enterprise Manager issue.
Additionally, this will not fix the cause of the 17883. This will only
provide additional diagnostic information for Microsoft Support should a
17883 occur which was not available in previous builds. If you believe you
are seeing performance issues at the time the 17883's are being recorded, I
urge you to open a case with Microsoft Support for assistance.
Regards,
Farooq Mahmud [MS SQL Support]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Are you secure? For information about the Strategic Technology Protection
Program and to order your FREE Security Tool Kit, please visit
http://www.microsoft.com/security.
|||Thank you so much for your answer.
I still don't understand why, when you read MS KB article
810885,under resolution, you find the reference for MS03-
031 Cumulative Security Patch for SQL Server.
What does this cumulative patch solve?
I was sure that it will solve many problems, most of them
security related, but also the 17883 problem.
If this cumulative patch does not solve the 17883 problem
so I don't need to install any patch, right?
Am I wrong?
Please advise.

Error: 17883 - problem with Scheduler

Hello!
We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003 with
SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL Server error
log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to be non-yielding on
Scheduler 0.'
I found a couple of articles on MS website:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source. I am
wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to detect the
cause of this type of error message.
Thanks,
Igor
Hi
We had the issue as our SANs are very fast.
Once we identified the problem, we went to hotfix build 818 and then 952 and
as soon as SP4 came out, we applied it.
The problems do not occur anymore.
Regards
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eidXJjBfFHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hello!
> We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003 with
> SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL Server error
> log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to be non-yielding
> on Scheduler 0.'
> I found a couple of articles on MS website:
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
> One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source. I
> am wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to
> detect the cause of this type of error message.
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
|||Did you happen to remember when exactly problem disappear? We are on hotfix
818 (Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818). I know there are some AWE
related issues with SP4 that's why I am reluctant to install SP4.
Thanks,
Igor
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
news:%23P4CI1BfFHA.1148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> We had the issue as our SANs are very fast.
> Once we identified the problem, we went to hotfix build 818 and then 952
> and as soon as SP4 came out, we applied it.
> The problems do not occur anymore.
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eidXJjBfFHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
|||I think there is a hot fix after SP4 for this issue.
It changes SQL version to 8.00.2040
"imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23hTvPqDfFHA.2152@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Did you happen to remember when exactly problem disappear? We are on
> hotfix 818 (Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818). I know there are some
> AWE related issues with SP4 that's why I am reluctant to install SP4.
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> "Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
> news:%23P4CI1BfFHA.1148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
|||Thanks,Mike!
Igor
"ME" <ME@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%239oT6TLfFHA.3448@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>I think there is a hot fix after SP4 for this issue.
> It changes SQL version to 8.00.2040
>
> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23hTvPqDfFHA.2152@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>

Monday, March 19, 2012

Error: 17883 - problem with Scheduler

Hello!
We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003 with
SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL Server error
log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to be non-yielding on
Scheduler 0.'
I found a couple of articles on MS website:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source. I am
wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to detect the
cause of this type of error message.
Thanks,
IgorHi
We had the issue as our SANs are very fast.
Once we identified the problem, we went to hotfix build 818 and then 952 and
as soon as SP4 came out, we applied it.
The problems do not occur anymore.
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eidXJjBfFHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hello!
> We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003 with
> SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL Server error
> log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to be non-yielding
> on Scheduler 0.'
> I found a couple of articles on MS website:
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
> One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source. I
> am wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to
> detect the cause of this type of error message.
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>|||Did you happen to remember when exactly problem disappear? We are on hotfix
818 (Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818). I know there are some AWE
related issues with SP4 that's why I am reluctant to install SP4.
Thanks,
Igor
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
news:%23P4CI1BfFHA.1148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> We had the issue as our SANs are very fast.
> Once we identified the problem, we went to hotfix build 818 and then 952
> and as soon as SP4 came out, we applied it.
> The problems do not occur anymore.
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eidXJjBfFHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>|||I think there is a hot fix after SP4 for this issue.
It changes SQL version to 8.00.2040
"imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23hTvPqDfFHA.2152@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Did you happen to remember when exactly problem disappear? We are on
> hotfix 818 (Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818). I know there are some
> AWE related issues with SP4 that's why I am reluctant to install SP4.
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> "Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
> news:%23P4CI1BfFHA.1148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>|||Thanks,Mike!
Igor
"ME" <ME@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%239oT6TLfFHA.3448@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>I think there is a hot fix after SP4 for this issue.
> It changes SQL version to 8.00.2040
>
> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23hTvPqDfFHA.2152@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>

Error: 17883 - problem with Scheduler

Hello!
We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003 with
SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL Server error
log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to be non-yielding on
Scheduler 0.'
I found a couple of articles on MS website:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source. I am
wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to detect the
cause of this type of error message.
Thanks,
IgorHi
We had the issue as our SANs are very fast.
Once we identified the problem, we went to hotfix build 818 and then 952 and
as soon as SP4 came out, we applied it.
The problems do not occur anymore.
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eidXJjBfFHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hello!
> We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003 with
> SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL Server error
> log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to be non-yielding
> on Scheduler 0.'
> I found a couple of articles on MS website:
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
> One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source. I
> am wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to
> detect the cause of this type of error message.
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>|||Did you happen to remember when exactly problem disappear? We are on hotfix
818 (Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818). I know there are some AWE
related issues with SP4 that's why I am reluctant to install SP4.
Thanks,
Igor
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
news:%23P4CI1BfFHA.1148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> We had the issue as our SANs are very fast.
> Once we identified the problem, we went to hotfix build 818 and then 952
> and as soon as SP4 came out, we applied it.
> The problems do not occur anymore.
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eidXJjBfFHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Hello!
>> We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003
>> with SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL Server
>> error log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to be
>> non-yielding on Scheduler 0.'
>> I found a couple of articles on MS website:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
>> One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source. I
>> am wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to
>> detect the cause of this type of error message.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Igor
>>
>|||I think there is a hot fix after SP4 for this issue.
It changes SQL version to 8.00.2040
"imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23hTvPqDfFHA.2152@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Did you happen to remember when exactly problem disappear? We are on
> hotfix 818 (Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818). I know there are some
> AWE related issues with SP4 that's why I am reluctant to install SP4.
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> "Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
> news:%23P4CI1BfFHA.1148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> Hi
>> We had the issue as our SANs are very fast.
>> Once we identified the problem, we went to hotfix build 818 and then 952
>> and as soon as SP4 came out, we applied it.
>> The problems do not occur anymore.
>> Regards
>> --
>> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>> Zurich, Switzerland
>> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
>> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
>> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eidXJjBfFHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Hello!
>> We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003
>> with SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL
>> Server error log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to
>> be non-yielding on Scheduler 0.'
>> I found a couple of articles on MS website:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
>> One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source. I
>> am wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to
>> detect the cause of this type of error message.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Igor
>>
>>
>|||Thanks,Mike!
Igor
"ME" <ME@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%239oT6TLfFHA.3448@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>I think there is a hot fix after SP4 for this issue.
> It changes SQL version to 8.00.2040
>
> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23hTvPqDfFHA.2152@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> Did you happen to remember when exactly problem disappear? We are on
>> hotfix 818 (Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818). I know there are some
>> AWE related issues with SP4 that's why I am reluctant to install SP4.
>> Thanks,
>> Igor
>>
>> "Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
>> news:%23P4CI1BfFHA.1148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> Hi
>> We had the issue as our SANs are very fast.
>> Once we identified the problem, we went to hotfix build 818 and then 952
>> and as soon as SP4 came out, we applied it.
>> The problems do not occur anymore.
>> Regards
>> --
>> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>> Zurich, Switzerland
>> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
>> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
>> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
>> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eidXJjBfFHA.1416@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Hello!
>> We are running SQL Server 200 SP Enterprise Edition on Windows 2003
>> with SAN components. Just recently, we got an error message in SQL
>> Server error log:'Process 53:0 (ac8) UMS Context 0x11EF2ED8 appears to
>> be non-yielding on Scheduler 0.'
>> I found a couple of articles on MS website:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319892
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810885
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890637
>> One of the articles refers to High-End disk system as possible source.
>> I am wondering whether anyone had similar problem and had been able to
>> detect the cause of this type of error message.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Igor
>>
>>
>>
>